First of all, many thanks to everyone who contributed to the first UK Learning Space SIG meeting – there were some brilliant conversations over the course of the day, and some excellent inputs from those who attended. We’ll be adding the resources, slides and notes over time – but for now, this is just to apologise for the fact it’s all gone a bit quiet. Unfortunately real life has taken over a bit recently – but enough excuses
Here are some of the thoughts collected during our discussions on the future direction of the SIG:
Constitution of group – attendees were broadly supportive of an inclusive approach to membership, not restricting to HE (it was noted that the fact most attendees represented HE institutions was accidental rather than being designed in!). The thinking was that we should have a broad remit to include schools, FE colleges, architects and other consultancy firms, and that this would be beneficial to group.
Schedule of meetings – opinion was divided here: some members felt that 3-4 meetings per year would be about right; others were concerned about meeting overload. It was suggested that one way around this could be to establish specific themes for meetings, people could opt-in as appropriate.
Communications – there was support for the idea that the wordpress site (ie, this site!) should be main communications channel for group – we discussed adding a listserve too but the group felt that this could complicate things, and create too many places to look for information.
Profiles – the group agreed that we should maintain profiles of members, including a short description of main interests/expertise, etc, and background – does anyone have a suggestion of a (preferably free) tool that would fulfil this need?
Size of group – value comes from connections and discussions, so a small manageable group at each meeting, and timetable to allow discussion would be best approach. It was also noted that it’s important to recognise connections are forged f2f but can continue outside meetings. There was also no suggestion that we should restrict the overall size or membership of the group, and that this is likely to evolve over time.
Steering group – the group agreed that some level of co-ordination is needed, and for now we propose rolling programme of involvement with main responsibility for each meeting being adopted by hosting institution.
I hope this starts to capture some of the conversations? Any additional thoughts, suggestions or comments more than welcome.